Faculty or Leadership Eligibility (Required)
I am a UW faculty member, director of an academic unit, chair, or dean.
Unit or Department Informed (Required)
I have shared this nomination with the head of my unit or department.
Self nomination? (Required)
Endowment Guidelines Acknowledgment (Required)
I certify that I have read the criteria for the Walker-Ames, Danz, and Mangels endowments.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
UW Faculty Nomination
Past-Speaker Eligibility Confirmation (Required)
I have verified that the nominee has not previously spoken as part of the UW Lectures series.
Past lecturers are not eligible for nomination. Review the complete
List of Past Speakers before submitting.
Nominator Information
Nominator Name (Required)
Is the nominator also the contact person? (Required)
Contact Person Name (Required)
Co Sponsor Information
This nomination has co-sponsors (Required)
Co-sponsor's Unit or Department Informed (Required)
I have confirmed this nomination with a the head of the co-sponsor's unit or department.
Co-sponsors
Enter the name and email address of each co-sponsor. Select “Add” to include additional co-sponsors, up to five.
Co-sponsor Assistance
Would you like assistance identifying or contacting co-sponsors for this nomination?
Nominee Information
Nominee Name (Required)
Lecture Endowment (Required)
For descriptions of each endowment, review the Nomination Guidelines.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Lecture Endowment (Required)
Mission Fit and Motivation for Nomination (Required)
Why is this nominee and proposed lecture a strong fit for the Office of Public Lectures’ purpose of connecting the University and the public through engagement with significant ideas? Explain what makes the nomination timely, compelling, or distinctive.
Intellectual Quality (Required)
What scholarship, expertise, professional accomplishment, or body of work demonstrates that the nominee can contribute substantive ideas worthy of public engagement? Describe the credibility and significance of the nominee’s work, independent of whether audiences agree with its conclusions.
Relevant Expertise and Subject-Matter Knowledge (Required)
What demonstrated subject-matter expertise does the nominee bring to the proposed topic? Identify relevant scholarship, professional practice, publications, lived experience, or equivalent accomplishments, and explain how they connect directly to the proposed lecture.
Multi Department Appeal and University Benefit (Required)
How would the nominee’s visit engage more than one academic department, school, college, or campus unit and appeal to a broad cross-section of the University community? Explain how the proposed lecture aligns with the interdisciplinary mission of the Walker-Ames or Mangels Lecture Series, or with the mission of the selected endowment.
Public Speaking Ability (Required)
What evidence demonstrates the nominee’s ability to communicate clearly, effectively, and engagingly with a public, non-specialist audience? Describe the nominee’s speaking experience, presentation style, and ability to engage a generally informed and diverse audience.
Public Value (Required)
What meaningful benefit would this event provide to the University and the public? Explain how the nominee and proposed topic could advance understanding, encourage dialogue, or deepen engagement with significant ideas.
Safety Considerations Disclosure (Required)
Are you aware of any safety concerns that may be associated with this speaker that the University should consider when hosting them as a public-facing speaker? The University of Washington is committed to the free and open exchange of ideas, including ideas or topics that may be challenging, provocative, or unpopular. This question is not about a speaker’s viewpoint. It is intended solely to identify legitimate, objective safety considerations, such as documented threats, prior security incidents, or credible risk factors associated with hosting this speaker or discussing this topic. A “Yes” or “Unsure” response is not disqualifying and will not be used to evaluate the merit of the speaker’s ideas.
Safety Concern and Relevant Context
If you selected “Yes” or “Unsure,” describe the nature of the safety concern and any relevant context so the Selection Committee and Office of Public Lectures staff can fully evaluate the nomination. (Minimum approximately 100 words.)
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Hate Speech Attestation (Required)
To the best of your knowledge, has the speaker you are nominating ever engaged in hate speech? Definition: The Office of Public Lectures defines hate speech as any speech that vilifies, intimidates, or incites hatred against a person or group on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or other protected characteristics. This standard is consistent with the OPL Zero Tolerance Policy on Hate Speech, which applies to all speakers appearing at OPL-sponsored events.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Hate Speech Additional Context
If you selected “Yes” or “Unsure,” provide additional context, including the relevant statement, conduct, source, or other information known to you. Selecting “Yes” or “Unsure” does not automatically disqualify a nomination. The Selection Committee will review all responses in the context of the full nomination packet. Nominators are expected to respond honestly and in good faith. Incomplete or evasive responses may affect the committee’s ability to fully evaluate the nomination.
Supporting Materials
Speaking Links (Required)
Provide up to five links to recordings or other examples of the nominee speaking to a public audience. Examples may include lectures, interviews, panels, or presentations.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Nomination Contact Name (Required)
Person the Office of Public Lectures should contact about this nomination.
Submission Certification (Required)
I certify that the information provided is accurate to the best of my knowledge, that I have permission to submit this nomination, and that the supporting materials may be reviewed by the University of Washington Office of Public Lectures.
Thank you for submitting your nomination! You'll receive a confirmation email from the Office of Public Lectures within one week. If you don't hear from us by then, please reach out to lectures@uw.edu.
Thank you for submitting your nomination! You'll receive a confirmation email from the Office of Public Lectures within one week. If you don't hear from us by then, please reach out to lectures@uw.edu.